The Less than Attractive Experiment

[Carlee]

Got to thinking of all the bar girls I've had over the years, what kinds have been the most satisfying?What kind were the least satisfying?:idea:

Leaving out the girls I really hit it off with for personal reasons.:yipi:

Taking only the ones who ended up being one nighters.:tux:

Lets talk sexual satisfaction versus looks.:yes:

For every 10 girls who were a 7 or more in looks how many rated 7 or more in bed?
At a guess I would say maybe 3/10. With maybe 3/10 being total duds.The rest average.

For every 10 girls rating less than 7/10 in looks how many rated 7 or more in bed?
At a guess I would say 5/10.With maybe 2/10 being total duds.The rest being average

Lets talk personality satisfaction versus looks:yes:

for every 10 rating 7 or more in looks how many had a nice/pleasing/interesting personality, rating 7 or more.

here I wud guess maybe 2/10.With 5/10 being a dud personality.

for every 10 girls with looks less than 7/10 how many had a 7+ personality.

here I wud say maybe 6/10.With maybe 1 or 2 being total duds.

So heres my experiment.

Next time I visit phuket the first 10 girls I bar fine I'm going to take girls with looks less than 7.The ones who are left in the bar after the lookers are booked out.

The next 10 I will only take 7+ lookers.Then compare the 2 groups.

If I wanted to get scientific I could even write out a script to follow in terms of converstion and activities.:rofl:

Now of course theres argument as to what makes a 7+ looker, but in general terms we all know whats universally attractive and whats not.:neutral:

 

[sunshine_honey69]

To be even more scientific someone else should interview the girls afterwards to see how you measured up. 55555

 

[So slick.]

Is there a credible university that will accept this study as my PhD thesis proposal?

 

[AverageJoe]

Interesting experiment but the results won't mean much unless you include whether the girl likes you or not.

 

[New England Babe]

My most regular BGs have been very ordinary looking,its all about the performance IMO.

 

[parkcaitlan]

And of course you are always a 10.:sarcastic:

 

[Samira]

You don't look at the mantlepiece when yer poking the fire eh !!!! 5555

 

[Colette~]

where i come from the customer is always right 55

 

[Lion Rampant]

55555 Touche.

 

[Magic 8 Ball]

You scientific results will be skewed unless you include.

1 : BG's who score 0-5 in you estimation.
2 : LB's who start out as 11 out of 10 then get eliminated.

Performance really is everything.

 

[Kelly M]

So - trimmed down, you are paying prostitutes, some who may act better than others.

Flawed research!! 5555555555555

 

[kristina]

not relevant soupy as I would be the only constant in the experiment.I am "the control group" in experimental termsh::sarcastic::wai:

 

[JUMPMASTER]

:intello::intello::intello:

dunno, but phuket university should consider it.Easy access to research material.

IAMO:^^::intello:

 

[Pompal 09.]

I tip my hat to anyone who can remain "constant" on Phuket, I am all over the bloody shop. 555555

 

[denise t]

I bought some nice Prime rib steak ad cooked it myself then ate it...fcuk it was good, made me feel warm inside so i decided to get another and though i thought i cooked it right just wasn't...strange i am the best cook in the world how could i have failed!!!!!!
Rating girls.......they might as well be meat......

 

[HRmassage]

3 different blokes would score the same girl very differently.
Even a starfish one night can become a bronco the next.

 

[Bodyzone21]

Its about chemistry and many other factors, a bad girl for one punter can be excellent for another guy. And a 10 points girl may be a 7 to another and vice versa. Interesting anyway...

 

[The Mad Russian (????)]

DrDK is working on his (allegedly).

 

[Ro .]

I think Nicke hit the nail on the head there, in theory it sounds like a great experiment, but in practice it's all about opinions...

 

[SuzzHuzz]

I think the Title says it all...................